Skip to content
AZ Tools

Radiation Dose Converter (Gy, Sv, rad, rem)

Convert absorbed dose between gray and rad and equivalent dose between sievert and rem, with the weighting factor needed to cross between them.

Sv (sievert)

0.001

mSv

1

µSv

1,000

rem

0.1

mrem

100

Cross to the other quantity

Gy (gray)

0.001

Gray and sievert are both joules per kilogram, but they are not the same quantity. Crossing between them needs the weighting factor of the radiation involved, so this figure is only as good as the w_R you entered.

How to use

  1. Pick which quantity you have: absorbed dose in the gray family, or equivalent dose in the sievert family.
  2. Type the value and choose its unit. Every other unit in that family updates at once.
  3. To cross into the other quantity, enter the radiation weighting factor — 1 for photons and electrons, 20 for alpha particles — and read the converted figure below it.

About this tool

Show

Two families of units in one place. Absorbed dose — how much energy the material took up per unit mass — is measured in gray, with the older rad at exactly one hundredth of it, so 1 Gy is 100 rad. Equivalent dose — absorbed dose scaled by how damaging that particular radiation is to tissue — is measured in sievert, with the rem again at exactly one hundredth, so 1 Sv is 100 rem. Every conversion inside a family is exact, because the rad, the rem and the metric prefixes are all defined rather than measured.

What this tool deliberately will not do is convert a gray straight into a sievert. Both are joules per kilogram, they have the same dimensions, and a calculator that only looks at dimensions will happily treat them as the same unit. They are not: the sievert carries a radiation weighting factor on top of the energy. For photons, X-rays, gamma rays and electrons that factor is 1, which is exactly why the two units look interchangeable in medical imaging — 1 mGy from a chest X-ray really is 1 mSv. For protons it is 2, for alpha particles and heavy ions it is 20, and for neutrons it runs from about 2.5 to 20 depending on their energy. So the same 1 mGy of alpha exposure is 20 mSv, twenty times the risk for the same deposited energy.

That is why the cross-quantity card asks for the factor instead of assuming one. Enter the w_R for the radiation you are dealing with and it applies Sv = Gy × w_R in one direction and Gy = Sv ÷ w_R in the other; leave it at 1 and you are stating that you are dealing with photons or electrons.

For a sense of scale, the sievert is an enormous unit for everyday purposes: natural background is on the order of a few millisieverts a year, a chest radiograph is around a tenth of a millisievert, and the microsievert is the unit that survey meters actually read in. Values below 0.0001 are shown in exponential form and everything else to eight significant digits.

Frequently asked questions

Is 1 gray the same as 1 sievert?

Only for radiation whose weighting factor is 1, which covers photons, X-rays, gamma rays and electrons. For those, 1 Gy of absorbed dose is 1 Sv of equivalent dose, and that coincidence is why the units are so often confused. For alpha particles the factor is 20, so 1 Gy is 20 Sv — the same energy, twenty times the biological weight.

Why do rad and rem both mean one hundredth?

Both are the CGS-era units that the SI pair replaced, and both were defined so that the changeover was a clean factor of 100. The rad is exactly 0.01 Gy and the rem is exactly 0.01 Sv, so converting either way only moves the decimal point two places. Older American medical and industrial paperwork still uses them.

What is the difference between equivalent and effective dose?

Equivalent dose weights the absorbed dose by the type of radiation, which is what this tool does. Effective dose goes one step further and weights each organ by how sensitive it is, then sums the whole body. Both are reported in sievert, so a figure in Sv does not by itself tell you which of the two it is — that has to come from the context it was quoted in.

Which unit will a survey meter show?

Usually microsieverts per hour, because the sievert is far too large for ambient measurement: natural background is a few millisieverts spread over a whole year. Note that a dose rate is not a dose — multiply by the exposure time before comparing a meter reading against an annual figure.

Does the tool handle becquerels or curies?

No, and deliberately: those measure activity, how many nuclei decay per second in a source, not dose received by anything. Going from activity to dose depends on the isotope, the geometry, the distance and the shielding, so it is not a unit conversion at all.

Related tools